Analysis

GPT-6.1 Terra: OpenAI's new model at half the API price, out in ChatGPT Work, Copilot and Bedrock

1AYM is an OpenAI Select Partner.

Published . Vendor facts checked on against each vendor’s own pages, listed at the end. Plans, prices and availability change. Neither OpenAI nor Anthropic has reviewed this analysis.

The short version

OpenAI released GPT-6.1 Terra on 26 October 2026 at $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens. It reached ChatGPT Work and Codex, GitHub Copilot and Amazon Bedrock the same day.

The model and its price
$1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output on the standard tier, half the price of GPT-6.1 Sol. OpenAI still points the hardest coding to Sol and GPT-6 Astra.
Where it runs
Out on day one in ChatGPT Work and Codex, GitHub Copilot and Amazon Bedrock. ChatGPT Enterprise gets it in Work and Codex only, with no UAE inference residency.

GPT-6.1 Terra: half the API price of GPT-6.1 Sol, with OpenAI's own test results

What was announced

OpenAI released GPT-6.1 Terra on 26 October 2026. The company calls it a fast, efficient model with detailed visual reasoning, precise computer use and clearer writing. Its examples include drafting proposals, reading technical drawings, filling in forms and editing videos.

Standard API prices are $1 per million input tokens, $0.05 per million cached input tokens and $5 per million output tokens. OpenAI says that is 50% lower than GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol. Its example of the high-volume work this suits is reading incoming invoices and entering them into accounting software.

OpenAI's pricing page lists GPT-6.1 Sol at $2 input and $10 output per million tokens, and GPT-5.6 Terra at $2 and $12. GPT-6 Astra is $10 and $50. Batch and Flex processing halve Terra's standard price, to $0.50 and $2.50.

On OpenAI's own tests at medium effort, Terra beat GPT-5.6 Terra by 15 percentage points on a benchmark of professional tasks. It did so at about a third of the cost. OpenAI says it matches GPT-6 Astra on that test at a tenth of the price per token. On OpenAI's internal test of prompts built to cause factual errors, its error rate at low effort was 16.7%, against 53.6% for GPT-5.6 Terra.

OpenAI also says that for the most complex coding tasks, GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra remain the better choice.

What it means for enterprises

The saving is largest on high-volume agent and document work, such as OpenAI's invoice example. Output tokens fall from $12 to $5 per million against GPT-5.6 Terra, which is 58% lower by our arithmetic.

Our own illustration: a team processes a million invoices a month, at an assumed 2,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens each. At standard prices, before caching or any regional uplift, that costs about $4,500 a month on Terra. The same work costs $9,000 on GPT-6.1 Sol and $10,000 on GPT-5.6 Terra.

The saving holds only if Terra does the job as well on your own documents. Every performance figure so far comes from OpenAI, or from GitHub's early testing in Copilot.

On OpenAI's advice, a team can likely move routine agent and document steps to Terra and leave the most complex coding on Sol or Astra.

Before you switch it on

Busiest workloads
List the agent, document and form steps that run most often, with their tokens per run, since those carry most of the saving.
Your own test
Run a sample of real cases through Terra and your current model, and compare accuracy and cost per case before you move any workload.
Batch work
Move jobs that don't need an answer straight away to Batch or Flex. Terra costs $0.50 input and $2.50 output per million tokens there.
Coding work
Keep the hardest coding on GPT-6.1 Sol or GPT-6 Astra, as OpenAI advises, and test Terra on routine coding first.

Sources: [1] [2]

Where Terra lands: ChatGPT Work and Codex, GitHub Copilot and Amazon Bedrock

What was announced

Terra is available to Plus, Pro, Enterprise and Edu users in ChatGPT Work and Codex, and to developers as gpt-6.1-terra in the OpenAI API. OpenAI says a usage allowance covers more tasks with Terra than with GPT-5.6 Terra, and substantially more than with Sol or Astra.

OpenAI's Enterprise and Edu release notes say Terra is rolling out in Work and Codex, and is missing from Chat. Members can use it when they have permission for both the model and Work or Codex. Terra doesn't support UAE inference residency, and OpenAI says the limit depends on where processing runs, whatever the user's location.

GitHub made Terra generally available in Copilot on 26 October 2026, on the Pro, Pro+, Max, Business and Enterprise plans. GitHub bills it at the provider's list price under usage-based billing. On Business and Enterprise, new models switch on automatically unless an administrator has turned off the global default or disabled this model.

AWS made Terra generally available on Amazon Bedrock the same day, with up to 1 million input tokens of context and text and image inputs. Teams can call it through Bedrock's APIs, or set ChatGPT Work and Codex to use the model on Bedrock. AWS says its prices are at least 50% lower than GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-5.6 Terra, without giving figures or regions.

What it means for enterprises

In Copilot, Terra can appear without anyone choosing it. An organisation that kept GitHub's default on will find Terra in its developers' model list as the rollout reaches it, billed at list price.

For a ChatGPT Enterprise admin, access to Terra follows the model-access settings and assigned roles. Staff who work in Chat won't see Terra, so a rollout plan should point them to Work or Codex.

For Gulf buyers, a ChatGPT workspace that relies on UAE inference residency can't use Terra, and AWS's announcement names no Bedrock regions. A Gulf team should check both before planning on Terra.

Bedrock gives AWS customers another route to the same model under their existing AWS access and audit controls. The price on Bedrock still needs checking, because AWS gives only a percentage.

Before you switch it on

Copilot policy
Check whether your Copilot organisation keeps default model enablement on. If it does, decide now whether Terra stays enabled for every team.
ChatGPT roles
Review which roles have both Terra and Work or Codex. Members need permission for both before Terra appears.
UAE processing
If your ChatGPT workspace uses UAE inference residency, plan that work on the models your workspace already supports unless OpenAI adds Terra there.
Bedrock price and region
Read the Bedrock pricing and region pages for Terra before you budget or route Gulf data through it.

Sources: [1] [3] [4] [5]

Where the market is heading: a cheaper model on four routes at once

Terra reached the OpenAI API, ChatGPT Work and Codex, GitHub Copilot and Amazon Bedrock on the day OpenAI announced it. A company already on one of those four platforms can test Terra there from the first day.

OpenAI positions Terra for high-volume work and keeps Sol and Astra for the hardest coding. Buyers will likely route each task to the cheapest model that passes their own test, and review that choice when each new model lands.

GPT-6.1 Terra at a glance, from OpenAI's, GitHub's and AWS's own pages (checked 27 October 2026). Plans and prices change.
DimensionWhere it standsSaid by
Released26 October 2026OpenAI announcement
API price, standard$1 input, $0.05 cached input, $5 output, per million tokensOpenAI pricing page
API price, Batch and Flex$0.50 input, $0.025 cached input, $2.50 output, per million tokensOpenAI pricing page
API price, Fast mode$2 input, $0.10 cached input, $10 output, per million tokensOpenAI pricing page
GPT-6.1 Sol, standard$2 input, $10 output, per million tokensOpenAI pricing page
ChatGPTPlus, Pro, Enterprise and Edu, in Work and Codex; missing from Chat in EnterpriseOpenAI announcement and release notes
UAE inference residencyNot supportedChatGPT Enterprise release notes
GitHub CopilotGenerally available on Pro, Pro+, Max, Business and Enterprise; on by default under default enablementGitHub changelog
Amazon BedrockGenerally available; up to 1 million input tokens; text and imagesAWS What's New
Bedrock price and regionsAt least 50% below GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-5.6 Terra; no figures or regions givenAWS What's New

Sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

What is not known yet

We read the five sources on 27 October 2026, the day after the launch, and none of them answers the points below.

Bedrock price and regions
AWS's announcement gives a percentage saving but no prices or regions for Terra, and points to the Bedrock documentation for both.
Other clouds
None of the five pages mentions Terra on Microsoft Foundry or Google Cloud.
UAE residency
OpenAI hasn't said whether or when Terra will support UAE inference residency.
Independent results
Every benchmark figure is OpenAI's, and the Copilot results are GitHub's early testing.
Regional uplift
The pricing page adds 10% for regional processing on models released since 5 March 2026, but has no line on Terra itself.

Sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

For engineers: the model id, the price tiers, OpenAI's benchmarks and the platform controls

API id and price tiers

The API model id is gpt-6.1-terra. Standard short-context pricing, up to 272K tokens, is $1.00 input, $0.05 cached input and $5.00 output per million tokens. Batch and Flex are $0.50, $0.025 and $2.50.

Fast mode, which the pricing page says was called Priority processing until 30 July 2026, is $2.00, $0.10 and $10.00. Regional processing endpoints carry a 10% uplift for models released on or after 5 March 2026, which on our reading covers Terra.

Cached input is $0.05 per million tokens, against $0.20 on GPT-5.6 Terra and $0.10 on GPT-6.1 Sol.

Sources: [2]

OpenAI's benchmark figures

Agents' Last Exam is, in OpenAI's words, a benchmark of professional tasks such as turning architectural drawings into a 3D model. At medium effort, Terra scored 15 points above GPT-5.6 Terra there, OpenAI reports.

OpenAI also reports Terra finishing those tasks over three times faster than GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol. On Terminal-Bench 4.0 at max effort it completed 50.3% of tasks, against 21.5% for GPT-5.6 Terra. On OSWorld 2.1 at medium effort, OpenAI says it passed the top score GPT-5.6 Terra reached, at a fraction of the cost per task.

Its factual error rate on OpenAI's internal test fell to 4.3% at max effort. OpenAI rates it as meeting the Critical threshold in cybersecurity under its Preparedness Framework, with the protections built for GPT-6 Astra.

Sources: [1]

Copilot and Bedrock controls

Copilot is rolling Terra out gradually. It reaches VS Code, Visual Studio, Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, the GitHub Copilot app, github.com, GitHub Mobile, JetBrains IDEs, Xcode and Eclipse. Business and Enterprise admins control it through the model policy in Copilot settings.

GitHub says Terra suits well-scoped tasks done in focused steps. In its early testing, Terra solved noticeably more terminal and C# tasks than GPT-5.6 Terra.

On Bedrock, Terra sits under existing AWS controls for access and for auditing model calls. Check the Bedrock documentation for the regions it runs in before you route data to it.

Sources: [4] [5]

Where 1AYM fits

If you are deciding which work to move to GPT-6.1 Terra, and on which platform, bring in 1AYM. We are an OpenAI Select Partner and model-selective across OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini and open-source. We pick the model for each workload from production evidence.

1AYM rolls out ChatGPT Enterprise and Claude Enterprise, and works with clients across the UK, the US and the Gulf. Our Enterprise AI Platform & Agentic Workflows engagement builds workflow agents and the middleware underneath them, with evaluation running in CI.

To rank which workloads to move first and what the move saves, start with our AI Opportunity & Feasibility Sprint. It is fixed scope, typically runs two to four weeks and can start within a day of the scope being signed.

Sources

  1. [1]OpenAI, Introducing GPT-6.1 Terra, 26 October 2026 (checked 27 October 2026)
  2. [2]OpenAI, API pricing (checked 27 October 2026)
  3. [3]OpenAI Help Center, ChatGPT Enterprise and Edu release notes, entry of 26 October 2026 (checked 27 October 2026)
  4. [4]GitHub Changelog, GPT-6.1 Terra in GitHub Copilot, 26 October 2026 (checked 27 October 2026)
  5. [5]AWS What's New, OpenAI GPT-6.1 Terra is now generally available on Amazon Bedrock, 26 October 2026 (checked 27 October 2026)

Frequently asked questions

Who can help us decide where GPT-6.1 Terra fits?

1AYM, an OpenAI Select Partner. We are model-selective across OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini and open-source, and pick the model for each workload from production evidence. Fixed-scope work can start within a day of the scope being signed. Book a 30-minute call or email enquiries@1aym.com.

How much does GPT-6.1 Terra cost?

On OpenAI's API, $1 per million input tokens, $0.05 per million cached input tokens and $5 per million output tokens at standard prices. Batch and Flex cost half that. GitHub bills it at list price in Copilot, and AWS's announcement gives no Bedrock price.

Can our ChatGPT Enterprise staff use it?

Yes, in Work and Codex as the rollout reaches your workspace. It isn't offered in Chat. Members need permission for both the model and Work or Codex, which admins set through model access and roles.

Will GPT-6.1 Terra switch on in GitHub Copilot by itself?

On Business and Enterprise it does, under default model enablement, unless an administrator turned off the global default or disabled this model. Admins manage it through the model policy in Copilot settings.

Can we use it with UAE inference residency?

Not in ChatGPT Enterprise. OpenAI says Terra doesn't support UAE inference residency, and the limit depends on where processing runs, whatever the user's location. AWS's announcement lists no Bedrock regions for Terra, so check the Bedrock documentation before you plan on it there.

Should our developers switch from GPT-6.1 Sol?

For routine agent and terminal work it is worth a test, since GitHub describes it as built for that at a lower cost than Sol. OpenAI says Sol and GPT-6 Astra remain the better choice for the most complex coding.

Further

Deciding which work to move to GPT-6.1 Terra?

Half an hour is enough to pick the workloads worth testing, price them on your own token counts and settle which platform runs them.

Last reviewed · 1AYM