Analysis

OpenAI DevDay 2026: what each announcement means for enterprises

1AYM is an OpenAI Select Partner. Its founder holds personal Claude certifications. 1AYM is not an Anthropic partner.

Published . Vendor facts checked on against each vendor’s own pages, listed at the end. Plans, prices and availability change. Neither OpenAI nor Anthropic has reviewed this analysis.

The short version

OpenAI says it made more than 20 announcements. Ten of them change something for an enterprise buyer, and each has its own section below, so you can skip to the one on your desk. Each section ends with my take.

Dots
Always-on agents with their own cloud computer, in ChatGPT, Slack and Teams. My take: context that follows you across channels is the reason to pay attention.
ChatGPT Space, Pages and teams
A shared team home inside ChatGPT, with Pages and scheduled team tasks. My take: a definite win, because the workspace now lives in the harness.
Codex in the cloud
Codex runs in the cloud from any device, in shared, approved environments. My take: a major lifestyle win for developers.
Codex Security Cloud and Code Review
Repository scanning and code review that run while you are away. Pilot it on one repository first. My take: I would let it review, and plenty of organisations already do.
Agents API and Bedrock Managed Agents
Infrastructure for agents that drive software through its screens, and an option that runs entirely in AWS. My take: we can build on it, and AWS makes it easier.
GPT-6.1 Sol and Ultrafast
A cheaper model OpenAI places close to its flagship, and a paid speed tier. Route by task, and set budgets first. My take: move to Sol after evals; Ultrafast costs too much at scale.
Private Intelligence
Zero Data Retention with automated safety reviews, and a Private Inference preview due this autumn. My take: great for government and confidential data.
Plugins, MCP Events and Sites
Richer plugins, hosting on Sites, and events that let a plugin start work on its own. My take: MCP Events is the sleeper of the day.
@ChatGPT in Slack and Teams
Staff without a ChatGPT licence can call it in Slack and Teams channels. Settle the channel-data question first. My take: I would recommend it.
Sign in with ChatGPT, Pro 500 and the Marketplace
ChatGPT allowances in 16 partner tools, a plan for heavy users, and OpenAI commitment you can spend on partner software. My take: the Marketplace helps adoption, and Pro 500 is for people hitting Pro 200 limits.

Dots: always-on agents that keep context across every channel

What was announced

A dot is an always-on agent powered by GPT-6 Astra, with its own cloud computer and browser. It learns from feedback, works towards the goals you set around the clock, connects to more than 4,000 apps through plugins and can run several projects at once. You can open its computer to see what it is doing, and with your permission it can use your laptop.

You reach the same dot in ChatGPT on desktop, web and mobile, in Slack and in Microsoft Teams, with texting to follow, and OpenAI says it carries its context across all of them. The first dot is included in Pro and Business Premium at no extra cost, with an allowance for deeper work and extended limits in the first month. Talking to it does not count against ChatGPT usage limits; tasks it starts in Codex or ChatGPT Work do.

Rollout began on 29 September 2026 for Pro and Business Premium in eligible markets. On Enterprise, Edu and Healthcare it is a beta, off until a workspace admin enables it. Specialist dots, with their own identity, credentials and IT-provisioned hardware, are a preview run as focused enterprise pilots with OpenAI's engineers, and integrate with Microsoft Agent 365 for governance and security.

What it means for enterprises

Dots change how an agent sits inside a company. An assistant waits to be asked; a dot researches in the background with read-only tools, works to goals and turns up where work already happens. That makes it a new kind of account in your estate, with its own computer, saved passwords and plugins into your systems, acting for a person when nobody is watching.

OpenAI has shipped controls for that: Custom Rules to allow an action, require approval for it or block it, an Activity View, automatic review of actions, monitoring that can pause or stop a dot, and saved passwords the model never sees. Sensitive steps such as changing a password stay with the person. OpenAI does not train on Business, Enterprise or Edu content by default, and says it does not train directly on a dot's research or notes.

Cross-channel context is not unique to OpenAI: Meta says its consumer agent Muse, launched on 8 September, keeps context across the apps a user authorises. The difference is that dots land inside a business workspace with admin switches, which is the part an IT team can govern.

Before you switch it on

Admin enablement
The Enterprise beta is off until an admin enables it. Pick a first group rather than the whole workspace.
Controls
Write the Custom Rules before the pilot, starting with anything that sends email, moves money or changes a record.
Data
List the plugins a dot may use, and confirm each system's own permissions still limit what it can reach.
Cost
Tasks a dot starts in Codex or ChatGPT Work draw on your allowances. Watch that usage once the first month's extended limits end.

My take

I think dots can become a really powerful tool, and the reason is context. A dot keeps the same context across every service you talk to it on, so what you told it in ChatGPT in the morning is still there when you pick the thread up in Slack in the afternoon. To me, that is the part that can work really well.

Sources: [1] [2] [9]

ChatGPT Space, Pages and teams: a shared workspace inside ChatGPT

What was announced

ChatGPT Space is a home for a team, where teammates, ChatGPT and your dot build on shared knowledge that ChatGPT keeps organised to your instructions. It is on Pro, Business and Enterprise on desktop and web. On mobile you can read and share now, with creation to follow.

Around it came Pages, documents built for people and agents to work on together; collaborative slides in the coming weeks; teams with shared tasks that run on a schedule or an event, on Business and Enterprise; a Meetings plugin in beta on the macOS app, which deletes the audio once the notes are ready; and shareable profiles.

What it means for enterprises

Shared team knowledge usually lives in a separate wiki, which the assistant reaches through a connector if at all. Space puts it where the model and the agent already are, which removes one copy of the truth and one connector to maintain.

The fair comparison is Notion, whose Custom Agents already run on schedules or triggers while you are offline, free to try and then $10 per 1,000 monthly Notion credits. Notion is also one of the 16 partner tools in OpenAI's Sign in with ChatGPT list, so this is not a simple replacement story. If you are still choosing between vendors, our comparison of ChatGPT Work against Claude Cowork sets out where each fits.

Scheduled team tasks act without anyone pressing a button, so each needs an owner, a scope and a log, like any other automation.

Before you switch it on

Admin enablement
Creating a Space is desktop and web for now, and team tasks are Business and Enterprise only.
Controls
Decide who can create a Space, who can add a dot to one and who owns each scheduled task.
Data
Agree what leaves your existing wiki and what stays. Two sources of truth are worse than one.
Cost
OpenAI lists Space within existing plans rather than as an add-on, so the larger cost is likely to be moving content and changing habits.

My take

ChatGPT Space makes things easier: you no longer have to use Notion to have a shared workspace. You can do it directly in the harness, where the model and your agents already live. That is a definite win.

Sources: [1] [10]

Codex in the cloud and the refreshed Codex CLI

What was announced

Codex now runs on your computer, remotely from your phone, or in the cloud from any device. Teams get reusable development environments that carry shared, approved settings and permissions. It is on Plus, Pro, Business, Healthcare, Education and Enterprise.

The Codex CLI was refreshed on every plan: voice to start and steer tasks, an /agents view for running several tasks at once, better prompt editing, session resume and worktrees.

What it means for enterprises

Running in the cloud changes where the work happens, and the security questions move with it. Code, secrets and network access now sit in an environment OpenAI runs, so the environment definition becomes the control: which repositories it can clone, what it can reach on the network and which credentials it holds.

Reusable environments with approved settings are the useful part for a platform team. Instead of every engineer configuring an agent on their own laptop, you publish one environment that carries the rules, and everyone starts from it. That is the operating layer we describe in our guide to rolling out coding agents across an engineering team.

Before you switch it on

Admin enablement
Confirm cloud tasks are on for your workspace, and decide which repositories may connect.
Controls
Publish one approved environment per kind of repository, with network access and permissions set there, not on laptops.
Data
Keep secrets out of repositories and prompts, and give each environment the narrowest credentials that work.
Cost
Cloud tasks draw on plan allowances. Read the Codex pricing and credits rules before a team runs agents in parallel all day.

My take

For developers, Codex in the cloud, and the cloud computers the agents run on, is going to be a major lifestyle win. You can start a task, close the laptop and carry on from your phone or another machine, without leaving your own computer switched on all the time so the agent can keep going.

Sources: [1]

Codex Security Cloud and Code Review

What was announced

Codex Security Cloud scans whole GitHub repositories on demand or on a schedule, keeps checking new commits, and investigates, deduplicates and prepares fixes in the cloud with your laptop closed. It includes access to the Daybreak Blue model and is on Pro, Business, Enterprise and Edu.

Code Review arrives in the ChatGPT desktop app on every plan: summaries and diffs, a way to ask Codex about an issue before you comment on a GitHub pull request or a GitLab merge request, and automatic reviews that run in the cloud while you are away.

What it means for enterprises

Scheduled scanning with prepared fixes saves time where security work often stalls, which is triage. The risk is volume: a scanner that proposes fixes on every commit can bury a team in pull requests nobody has time to read. The deduplication OpenAI describes is aimed at that problem, and it is the first thing to test.

Automatic reviews raise a process question more than a technical one. Decide whether an AI review is advice or a gate, who may dismiss its findings and how a dismissal is recorded, before it runs on every merge request.

Before you switch it on

Admin enablement
Security Cloud needs Pro, Business, Enterprise or Edu; Code Review is on every plan.
Controls
Start with one repository on a schedule, not every commit everywhere.
Data
Connecting a scanner to whole repositories is a GitHub permission decision; scope it to the pilot repositories.
Cost
Count findings accepted against findings dismissed in the pilot. That ratio decides whether the review time is worth it.

My take

Yes, I would let it review. A lot of organisations already do this, and AI is great at security.

Sources: [1]

Agents API with computer use, and Bedrock Managed Agents

What was announced

The Agents API lets developers build agents that operate software through computer use. It brings over Codex's multi-agent capabilities, tool search, tool calling and context compaction, and OpenAI runs the infrastructure. It is in the API, and in Codex and ChatGPT Work on Pro 500 and Enterprise.

Bedrock Managed Agents, powered by OpenAI, was built with Amazon: OpenAI agents that run entirely in AWS. A Decisions API also launched in limited preview, in which the Luna model answers questions that have a fixed set of answers, for jobs such as classifying a request, routing it or choosing an agent's next step.

What it means for enterprises

Computer use matters for the systems that never got an API, such as an old finance tool or a supplier portal that only works in a browser. It is also the least predictable way to automate, because screens change and there is no contract to test against.

Bedrock Managed Agents suits organisations whose data, identity and spend already sit in AWS. Before choosing either, settle whether an agent is the right tool at all, or whether a plain integration would do the job.

Before you switch it on

Admin enablement
Inside Codex and ChatGPT Work, these features are Pro 500 and Enterprise only.
Controls
Give a computer-use agent its own narrow accounts, and log every action.
Data
Decide whether the agent runs on OpenAI's infrastructure or AWS's before any code is written; it follows your data residency and contracts.
Cost
Where an API exists, it is usually cheaper and more reliable than computer use.

My take

We can build this. If a client is already using AWS, the Bedrock option makes it a lot easier for us.

Sources: [1]

GPT-6.1 Sol and Ultrafast

What was announced

GPT-6.1 Sol upgrades GPT-6 Sol, and OpenAI points to agentic coding, computer use and professional work. OpenAI positions it close to GPT-6 Astra in capability at a fifth of Astra's standard input and output token prices. It is in the API and on Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise and Edu.

Ultrafast is a premium speed tier: up to eight times faster generation in Codex, where OpenAI quotes 300 tokens a second, and up to six times faster in the API. GPT-6 Astra Ultrafast is in the API, and in ChatGPT Work and Codex on Pro 500 and Enterprise. GPT-6.1 Sol Ultrafast is coming soon.

What it means for enterprises

A model at a fifth of the flagship's token price is a cost decision before it is a capability one. Agent workloads are often long runs of routine steps, and those are where the cheaper model should be tried first, with the flagship kept for the steps that fail without it. Test that routing in your own evaluation, not a vendor's chart.

Speed is worth paying for where a person is waiting, such as a developer watching Codex or an agent in a live conversation. It is rarely worth it for work that runs overnight. Either way, set budgets and limits on AI spend per team before a faster tier makes spend grow faster too.

Before you switch it on

Admin enablement
Check which models your admins allow, and whether your plan includes Ultrafast.
Controls
Pin model versions in production, so an upgrade is a decision you make.
Data
A new model keeps your data terms but changes behaviour, so re-run your evaluations first.
Cost
Compare cost per completed task, not per token; retries add up.

My take

Yes, I would move client agent workloads to Sol, but only after running evals. Ultrafast is cool, but it is too expensive to be useful at scale.

Sources: [1]

Private Intelligence: Zero Data Retention and Private Inference

What was announced

OpenAI grouped its privacy work under the name Private Intelligence. Zero Data Retention now comes with Private Safety Processing, which runs safety reviews automatically so that OpenAI staff do not access the content. Private Inference, which combines confidential computing with controls you can verify, is due in preview this autumn.

What it means for enterprises

For regulated buyers, the open question with Zero Data Retention has been who can see content that a safety system flags. Private Safety Processing is OpenAI's answer: the review is automated and staff do not access the content.

Private Inference goes further: controls a security team can verify would let it check the claim rather than trust it. It is a preview with no date beyond this autumn, so it should not carry a procurement decision yet. Where no provider may process the data at all, the answer is still running a private model instead.

Before you switch it on

Admin enablement
Ask OpenAI which products your Zero Data Retention terms cover, and where Private Safety Processing applies.
Controls
Keep your own logs: when the provider retains nothing, yours are the only record.
Data
Check how retention interacts with features that store things by design, such as a dot's notes or a Space.
Cost
Wait for Private Inference pricing before building a business case on it.

My take

This is great for government, and for any client that processes confidential data.

Sources: [1]

Plugins, MCP Events and Sites

What was announced

Plugins gain extensions: sidebar homes, interactive panels and file viewers, along with better tools for creating and finding plugins. Sites can now host plugins on Business, Enterprise, Healthcare and Edu, and MCP Events support lets plugins trigger automations.

What it means for enterprises

MCP Events changes how a plugin starts work. Until now a plugin mostly answered when asked; with events, something happening in another system can start the work. That is how an assistant becomes part of a process, and it is also how an automation ends up running at 3am with nobody watching.

Plugins hosted on Sites give IT one place to publish internal tools to staff inside ChatGPT, which beats every team wiring up its own connector. It also makes plugin review a job someone has to own: what each plugin can read, what it can change and who approved it.

Before you switch it on

Admin enablement
Decide who may publish a plugin to Sites, and who approves it.
Controls
Give every event-triggered automation an owner, an off switch and a failure alert.
Data
Review each plugin's scopes against the data it needs, with read-only as the default.
Cost
Event-driven runs use allowance unprompted, so set limits before connecting a busy event source.

My take

MCP Events is the sleeper announcement. Events open up a new world of capabilities.

Sources: [1]

@ChatGPT in Slack and Microsoft Teams

What was announced

Business and Enterprise customers can now let people call @ChatGPT in Slack and Microsoft Teams channels without each of them holding a ChatGPT licence.

What it means for enterprises

This changes the licence arithmetic. Staff who would use ChatGPT a few times a week are hard to justify a seat for, and now they can reach it where they already talk. It also means ChatGPT reads channel content in Slack and Teams, which is a data question as much as a productivity one.

Anthropic's nearest equivalent, Claude Tag, is a public beta for Team and Enterprise that works in Slack, runs each task in a short-lived sandbox and bills against an organisation usage balance with a spend limit an Owner sets. Its overview page describes Slack only, so a Teams-first organisation should check before assuming the two match.

Before you switch it on

Admin enablement
Install the app in a few channels first, not the whole organisation.
Controls
Treat @ChatGPT output in a channel as advice, never as an approval.
Data
Check what channel history it can read, including private and shared channels.
Cost
Ask OpenAI how @ChatGPT use by unlicensed staff is measured and billed.

My take

I'd recommend it. A lot of people already use @Claude.

Sources: [1] [11]

Sign in with ChatGPT, Pro 500 and the OpenAI Marketplace

What was announced

Sign in with ChatGPT lets people use their ChatGPT plan allowance in 16 partner tools, including Cognition's Devin, Notion, Vercel, T3, OpenClaw and Dactyl. Pro 500 is a new plan with 25 times the Plus allowance, and it includes Ultrafast.

The OpenAI Marketplace lets eligible enterprises apply part of their OpenAI commitment to approved partner software. The first 32 partners include Figma, Adobe, Sierra, Decagon, HubSpot, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Harvey, Legora, Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike and Baseten.

What it means for enterprises

The Marketplace is a procurement story. If you already hold an OpenAI commitment, software from those partners can draw it down, which can make a purchase simpler to approve. Read the commitment terms with that in mind: money spent on partner software is money that is not there for model usage later.

Sign in with ChatGPT moves identity the other way. It is convenient, but it gives company work a new route into third-party tools under a ChatGPT allowance rather than a contract your procurement team signed, which is what single sign-on and supplier reviews exist to catch.

Before you switch it on

Admin enablement
Find out whether admins can allow or block Sign in with ChatGPT for company accounts.
Controls
Keep the 16 partner tools on your supplier review list.
Data
Each partner keeps its own data terms; signing in with ChatGPT does not change them.
Cost
Buy Pro 500 for the people who run agents all day, and check which purchases count against your commitment.

My take

The Marketplace is great for gaining adoption. Pro 500 is for the power users who keep hitting their limits on Pro 200, and that will happen more now, because OpenAI has cut the usage a new Pro 200 subscription includes [13].

Sources: [1] [13]

Where the market is heading: agents that keep working with the laptop shut

On 23 September, a week before DevDay, Anthropic made cloud sessions for Claude Code generally available on Pro, Max and Team, and on Enterprise for people with premium seats or Chat + Claude Code seats. First shipped in October 2025 as Claude Code on the web, a cloud session keeps running after you close your laptop; you can start one from the browser, the mobile app, the desktop app or the terminal, and pull it back to your terminal later. Anthropic's routines, a research preview, run saved prompts on a schedule, from an API call or on GitHub events, also with the laptop closed.

Consumer and prosumer agents got there before dots. xAI published the design of Grok Bot, a persistent named agent on its own cloud computer that keeps working with no session open, on 3 September. Meta launched Muse on 8 September, an agent in its own cloud machine that carries on after you close the app. OpenAI's dots bring the same pattern into business workspaces.

Agents that keep working when your own machine is off, from each vendor's own pages (checked 30 September 2026)
DimensionDateKeeps working with your machine off?
xAI Grok Bot3 September 2026 (design article)Yes, on its own cloud computer
Meta Muse8 September 2026Yes, in its own cloud machine
Claude Code cloud sessionsGenerally available 23 September 2026Yes, until an idle session is reclaimed
OpenAI dots and Codex in the cloud29 September 2026Yes, on OpenAI's cloud computers
Claude Code Remote ControlAlready availableNo, the session runs on your own machine

My take

Anthropic has shipped cloud sessions for Claude Code too, and that shows you where the market is going. It is heading towards remote work: agents that run on someone else's computer, so you can carry on with a task without leaving your own machines switched on all the time.

Anthropic made cloud sessions generally available a week before DevDay. The contrast worth knowing is Anthropic's Remote Control, which steers a Claude Code session from your phone but runs it on your own machine, so that machine has to stay on.

For an enterprise, remote execution moves the control point from the laptop to the environment: what the cloud machine can reach, which credentials it holds and who can read its logs. Availability is not universal yet either. Claude Code cloud sessions need GitHub to clone and push, are not available to organisations on Zero Data Retention or through Bedrock or Vertex, and reclaim idle sessions, although reopening one restores the conversation.

Sources: [3] [4] [5] [6] [8] [9]

What is not known yet

Everything above comes from the vendors' own announcements, published two days before this post. Some questions they do not answer yet.

Pricing beyond the first dot
OpenAI describes add-on dots and scaling as future options, and there is no published price to plan against yet.
How the enterprise versions behave at scale
Dots on Enterprise is a beta and specialist dots are a preview run as focused pilots, so neither has a public track record in a large workspace yet.
Dates for the previews
Private Inference is due this autumn, GPT-6.1 Sol Ultrafast and texting for dots are coming soon, and collaborative slides are due in the coming weeks.
How the controls map to yours
The announcements describe OpenAI's own controls. How Custom Rules, the Activity View and retention settings line up with your data loss prevention, eDiscovery and audit tooling is something to test rather than assume.

Sources: [1] [2]

For engineers: the Agents API, Codex cloud environments and Bedrock Managed Agents

Agents API

Computer use plus Codex's multi-agent orchestration, tool search, tool calling and context compaction, on infrastructure OpenAI runs. Treat computer use as the fallback for systems without an API, give the agent its own low-privilege accounts, and log each action with the screen state it acted on.

Sources: [1]

Decisions API

Luna answers questions you define from a finite set of answers, which suits routing, classification and choosing an agent's next action. A finite answer set is easy to evaluate, so build a labelled set before trusting it with routing. It is in limited preview.

Sources: [1]

Codex cloud environments and the CLI

Reusable environments carry shared, approved settings and permissions, so treat each one as the unit of control: the repositories it can clone, where it can reach on the network and the credentials it holds, reviewed like infrastructure code. The refreshed CLI adds an /agents view, session resume and worktrees, which is what running several cloud tasks against one repository needs.

Sources: [1]

Bedrock Managed Agents

OpenAI agents that run entirely in AWS, built with Amazon. Before assuming it matches the Agents API feature for feature, check which capabilities are available there and how the agent maps to your IAM roles, networking and logging.

Sources: [1]

Claude Code cloud sessions, for comparison

By default a cloud session runs in an isolated Anthropic-managed VM (4 vCPUs, 16 GB of RAM, 30 GB of disk) or in your own self-hosted environment, with network access limited to a trusted allowlist and GitHub credentials kept outside the VM behind a proxy. An Owner has to allow remote sessions for the organisation. claude --cloud starts one from the terminal and --teleport pulls it back.

Anthropic's closer match to the Agents API is Claude Managed Agents, a hosted agent harness in beta that is not currently eligible for Zero Data Retention.

Sources: [3] [7] [12]

Where 1AYM fits

Setting up and rolling out these tools is core 1AYM work. We roll out ChatGPT Enterprise and Claude Enterprise, we have rolled out Claude Enterprise for a client, and 1AYM is an OpenAI Select Partner. Dots and ChatGPT Space are new, so the experience that carries over is the work around any agent: who gets it first, the rules it runs under, the identity and permissions it holds, and a pilot that measures something.

If you are deciding where to begin, we would start with our AI Opportunity & Feasibility Sprint: typically two to four weeks to decide which agents to switch on, and under which controls. For engineering teams moving Codex or Claude Code into the cloud, our AI Engineering Transformation work sets up the environments, permissions and CI gates the agents run inside. It does not have to start big: 1AYM takes small fixed-scope statements of work as well as larger builds.

Sources

  1. [1]OpenAI, DevDay 2026 recap, 29 September 2026 (checked 30 September 2026)
  2. [2]OpenAI, Introducing dots, 29 September 2026 (checked 30 September 2026)
  3. [3]Anthropic, Claude Code documentation: cloud sessions (checked 30 September 2026)
  4. [4]Anthropic, Claude Code on the web, with the 23 September 2026 general availability update (checked 30 September 2026)
  5. [5]Anthropic, Claude Code documentation: routines (checked 30 September 2026)
  6. [6]Anthropic, Claude Code documentation: Remote Control (checked 30 September 2026)
  7. [7]Anthropic, Claude Managed Agents overview (checked 30 September 2026)
  8. [8]xAI, Designing Grok Bot, 3 September 2026 (checked 30 September 2026)
  9. [9]Meta, Introducing Muse, 8 September 2026 (checked 30 September 2026)
  10. [10]Notion, pricing (checked 30 September 2026)
  11. [11]Anthropic, Claude Tag overview (checked 30 September 2026)
  12. [12]Anthropic, Claude Code documentation: cloud environments (checked 30 September 2026)
  13. [13]OpenAI Help Center, About ChatGPT Pro tiers (checked 1 October 2026)

Frequently asked questions

What is an OpenAI dot?

A dot is an always-on agent that OpenAI announced at DevDay on 29 September 2026. Each dot has its own cloud computer and browser, works towards goals you set, connects to apps through plugins and can be reached in ChatGPT, Slack and Microsoft Teams, with its context carried across those channels.

Is dots available on ChatGPT Enterprise?

As a beta. Dots launched on Pro and Business Premium in eligible markets on 29 September 2026. Enterprise, Edu and Healthcare workspaces can try it once a workspace admin enables it, and it is off by default.

Does OpenAI train on what a dot does for my company?

Not by default on Business, Enterprise or Edu. OpenAI says it does not train on content from those plans by default, and does not train directly on a dot's proactive research or its notes. Personal plans have their own training controls.

Do Codex and Claude Code keep working when my laptop is closed?

In the cloud, yes. Codex can now run tasks in the cloud from any device, and Anthropic's Claude Code cloud sessions keep running after you close your laptop. Anthropic's Remote Control is different: it steers a session running on your own machine, which has to stay on.

What should I ask a supplier who offers to roll out dots?

Ask what they would put in place before anyone uses it: who gets the beta first, the Custom Rules for actions that need approval or are blocked, which plugins a dot may connect to, how usage is watched after the first month, and what the pilot will measure. Dots are new, so ask what they have actually run rather than what they have read.

Further

Deciding what to switch on first?

Half an hour is enough to work out which of these announcements matter to your organisation, in what order, and under which controls.

Last reviewed · 1AYM